Care Transitions for Incarcerated Pregnant People: A Needs Assessment.

Incarcerated pregnant people face significant barriers when seeking health care services in prisons and jails, but little is known about their transitions from state prison health care systems to outside hospitals. This project analyzed current policies and procedures for care transitions for incarcerated people and presents policy recommendations to address issues of concern. We conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders at a state prison, academic hospital, and private hospital to identify the barriers and facilitators to care transitions. Themes emerging from these interviews were operational, including medical records, communication, and education; and structural, including implicit biases and care of marginalized groups. These findings are likely applicable to similar facilities throughout the United States. A multipronged, interdisciplinary approach is needed to address challenges of care transitions.

Race, ethnicity, and gender representation in clinical case vignettes: a 20-year comparison between two institutions.

BACKGROUND: The medical case vignette has long been used in medical student education and frequently includes demographic variables such as race, ethnicity and gender. However, inclusion of demographic variables without context may reinforce assumptions and biases. Yet, the absence of race, sexual orientation, and social determinants of health may reinforce a hidden curriculum that reflects cultural blindness. This replication study compared proportions of race, ethnicity, and gender with University of Minnesota (UMN) findings. This study sought to determine if there has been progress in the representation of demographic characteristics in case vignettes. METHODS: University of North Carolina (UNC) case vignettes from 2015-2016 were analyzed and compared to UMN case vignettes from 1996-1998. Data included mentions of race, ethnicity, gender and social determinants of health. RESULTS: In the 278 UNC vignettes, white race was noted in 19.7% of cases, black race was in 7.9% cases, and 76.6% of cases were unspecified. In the 983 UMN vignettes, white race was recorded in 2.85% cases, and black race in 0.41% cases. The institutions were significantly different in the proportion of their cases depicting race (0.20; 95% CI (0.15, 0.25)). Males were represented in the majority of vignettes. DISCUSSION: Comparing case vignettes results from two medical schools suggests that reporting explicit demographic diversity was not significantly different. The findings illustrate that sex was the demographic characteristic consistently described, where males were over-represented. Based on these findings, greater cultural diversity as it intersects with social determinants of health is needed in medical student education.

Adolescent Perceptions of Technology-Based Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Systematic Review.

Technology-based services, including telehealth, text messaging, and the internet are increasingly popular methods for adolescents and young adults (AYA) to access sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information and healthcare. This systematic review examined AYA perceptions of privacy and confidentiality of technology-based SRH services. The PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO were systematically searched in May 2021 to capture relevant qualitative or quantitative articles from the past 10 years. Included studies had AYA (i.e., mean age, 13-26-years with <10% of the sample outside this range), technology-based services for SRH, and outcomes of perceived privacy or confidentiality. Twenty-eight articles were included (N = 8638 AYA). Most studies utilized the internet and mobile apps to address human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV), sexually transmitted infections, and general SRH topics. Most AYA reported that these services were private and confidential, with minimal differences across SRH topic addressed. More interactive services had greater concerns (e.g., family or friends seeing notifications). Most AYA considered technology-based SRH to be confidential and private. As technology will likely remain an integrated part of healthcare delivery, improving the privacy and confidentiality of these services can facilitate AYA's independent and autonomous engagement in SRH care, and potentially improve their SRH outcomes.

Sociodemographic disparities as a determinant of fetal versus postnatal surgical myelomeningocele repair.

OBJECTIVE: Relatively few women undergo open maternal-fetal surgery (OMFS) for myelomeningocele (MMC) despite the potential to reverse hindbrain herniation, reduce the rate of infant shunt-dependent hydrocephalus, and improve ambulation. These benefits have the potential to significantly reduce morbidity and lifetime medical care. In this study, the authors examined demographics and socioeconomic variables of women who were offered and opted for OMFS for MMC versus postnatal MMC surgery, with the purpose of identifying variables driving the disparity between these two patient populations. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent evaluation for OMFS for MMC at a single academic hospital from 2015 to 2020. Race/ethnicity, primary insurance type, zip code, and BMI were collected and compared by treatment received and eligibility status for OMFS. Prevalence odds ratios were used to test for associations between each independent variable and the two outcomes. Logistical regression models were utilized to determine significant predictors of undergoing OMFS and being eligible for OMFS. RESULTS: Of 96 women, 36 underwent OMFS for MMC, 40 received postnatal repair, and 20 either terminated the pregnancy or received care at another institution. Overall, 66 (68.8%) women were White, 14 (14.6%) were Black, 13 (13.5%) were Hispanic/Latinx, 1 (1.0%) was Asian, and 2 (2.1%) identified as other or multiple races. Among women who underwent OMFS for MMC, 27 (75.0%) were White, 2 (5.6%) were Black, 4 (11.1%) were Hispanic/Latinx, 1 (2.8%) was Asian, and 2 (5.6%) identified as other or multiple races. Having private insurance or TRICARE was associated with higher odds of being eligible for OMFS compared with women who were uninsured or had Medicaid when accounting for race and income (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.51-9.59). CONCLUSIONS: The population evaluated and treated for MMC was homogeneous and insufficiently representative of the population affected by the disease. This finding raises concern, as it suggests underlying barriers to formal evaluation for OMFS for MMC. Insurance status and BMI have a significant association between the access to and election of OMFS, revealing socioeconomic disparities. This was the first study to explore sociodemographic characteristics of patient populations who may be at risk for limited access to highly specialized fetal surgical care.

Glaucoma Screening Using an iPad-Based Visual Field Test in a West African Population.

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) for use in clinic-based visual field testing in a low-resource setting. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and three participants (66 patients with glaucoma and 37 control participants) attending a clinical appointment at the Tema Eye Center, Tema, Ghana. METHODS: Patients with glaucoma and control participants underwent MRF and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), reliability parameters, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Mean MD was less negative and mean PSD was more positive on the MRF than the HFA in both groups (all P < 0.001). False-positive and false-negative rates were comparable between methods (P = 0.09 and P = 0.35, respectively). In patients with glaucoma, MD and PSD from the 2 devices were correlated strongly (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) and moderately (r = 0.61; P < 0.001), respectively. Agreement analysis revealed that MRF tended to generate significantly higher MD (bias, 3.3 ± 4.1 dB; P = 0.03) and PSD (bias, 1.9 ± 2.8 dB; P = 0.03) with wide limits of agreement. For detecting moderate to advanced glaucoma, the sensitivity was 60.9% for the MRF and 78.3% for the HFA (P = 0.10); respective specificities were 86.5% and 83.8% (P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The MRF underestimated MD and overestimated PSD values compared with the HFA. Agreement biases were significant, suggesting a weak agreement between the 2 devices. However, the MRF showed potential for screening in a low-resource setting, particularly for detecting moderate to advanced glaucoma.

Status of Simulation-Based Training in Departments of Surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Surgical simulation is particularly attractive because it allows training in a safe, controlled, and standardized environment. However, the status of surgical simulation among Departments of Surgery (DoS) in the United States is unknown. The objective of this study was to characterize the status of simulation-based training in DoS in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Qualtrics online survey was sent to 177 chairs of DoS in the United States in March 2018 regarding the utilization of surgical simulation in their department. Questions in the survey were focused on simulation capacities and activities as well as chairs' perception of the value and purpose of simulation. RESULTS: A total of 87 of 177 chairs responded to the survey (49% response rate). Most programs had either 20-50 trainees (42 of 87; 48%) or more than 50 trainees (37 of 87; 43%). Most chairs reported having a simulation center in their institution (85 of 87; 98%) or department (60 of 86; 70%) with a formal simulation curriculum for their trainees (83 of 87; 95%). Ninety percent (78 of 87) of DoS had protected time for simulation education for their residents, with most residents engaging in activities weekly or monthly (65 of 85; 76%). Although most chairs felt simulation improves patient safety (72 of 84; 86%) and is useful for practicing surgeons (68 of 84; 81%), only 40% reported that faculty use simulation to maintain technical skills and only 17% reported that faculty use simulation to address high complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of the DoS in the United States have established simulation activities for their trainees. However, engagement of faculty in simulation to maintain or improve their skills remains low.

"Live Sun Smart!" Testing the effectiveness of a sun safety program for middle schoolers.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is a well-recognized public health issue, and primary prevention is the most effective strategy for reducing skin cancer risk. The current recommendations are that behavioral counseling for sun safety measures is most beneficial and effective for children and adolescents and that targeting this population at primary and middle schools is the ideal intervention strategy to increase sun-protective behaviors and reduce UV exposure, sunburn incidence, and formation of new moles. Numerous studies on the effectiveness of school-based sun safety interventions among elementary and middle school students have shown an increase in sun safety knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors following the intervention. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot feasibility study of "Live Sun Smart!," (LSS) a school-based, multicomponent, interactive sun safety presentation, at changing sun safety knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among middle school students. METHODS: A non-randomized, single-group pretest-posttest interventional pilot study of the LSS program among children enrolled in grade 6. RESULTS: After exposure to LSS, participants were more likely to give correct answers to knowledge-based sun safety questions and to report negative attitudes toward tanning. Minimal and not significant changes were found in self-reported sun safety behaviors, though students did report an intention to change behaviors following the intervention. Participants were satisfied with the program and believed it increased their sun safety knowledge. CONCLUSION: Live Sun Smart! appears to be an effective school-based, multicomponent sun safety program for improving sun safety knowledge and attitudes toward tanning among middle school students in this initial test of it. The strengths and weaknesses of this pilot study have implications for future research.

Correction to: Association between furosemide in premature infants and sensorineural hearing loss and nephrocalcinosis: a systematic review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40748-018-0092-2.].

Association between furosemide in premature infants and sensorineural hearing loss and nephrocalcinosis: a systematic review.

Furosemide is a potent loop diuretic commonly and variably used by neonatologists to improve oxygenation and lung compliance in premature infants. There are several safety concerns with use of furosemide in premature infants, specifically the risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and nephrocalcinosis/nephrolithiasis (NC/NL). We conducted a systematic review of all trials and observational studies examining the association between these outcomes with exposure to furosemide in premature infants. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and clinicaltrials.gov. We included studies reporting either SNHL or NC/NL in premature infants (< 37 weeks completed gestational age) who received at least one dose of enteral or intravenous furosemide. Thirty-two studies met full inclusion criteria for the review, including 12 studies examining SNHL and 20 studies examining NC/NL. Only one randomized controlled trial was identified in this review. We found no evidence that furosemide exposure increases the risk of SNHL or NC/NL in premature infants, with varying quality of studies and found the strength of evidence for both outcomes to be low. The most common limitation in these studies was the lack of control for confounding factors. The evidence for the risk of SNHL and NC/NL in premature infants exposed to furosemide is low. Further randomized controlled trials of furosemide in premature infants are urgently needed to adequately assess the risk of SNHL and NC/NL, provide evidence for improved FDA labeling, and promote safer prescribing practices.

Teaching procedural skills to medical students: A pilot procedural skills lab.

BACKGROUND: Medical students have limited confidence in performing procedural skills. A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a multifaceted Procedural Skills Lab (PSL) on the confidence of medical students to perform procedural skills. METHODS: Twelve 2nd year medical students were randomly selected to participate in a pilot PSL. The PSL students met with an instructor for 2 h once a week for 4 weeks. Students participated in a flipped classroom and spaced education program before laboratory sessions that included a cadaver laboratory. Procedural skills included a focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) scan, cardiac echocardiogram, lumbar puncture, arthrocentesis, and insertion of intraosseous and intravenous catheters. Students in the PSL were asked to rank their confidence in performing procedural skills before and after completion of the laboratory sessions (Wilcoxon ranked-sum test). A web-based questionnaire was also emailed to all 2nd year medical students to establish a baseline frequency for observing, performing, and confidence performing procedural skills (Mann-Whitney U-test). RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent (n = 106) of 180 2nd year medical students (n = 12 PSL students [treatment group], n = 94 [control group]) completed the survey. Frequency of observation, performance, and confidence in performing procedural skills was similar between the control and treatment groups at baseline. There was an increased confidence level (p < 0.001) for performing all procedural skills for the treatment group after completion of the PSL. DISCUSSION: An innovative PSL may increase students' confidence to perform procedural skills. Future studies will examine competency after a PSL.

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the University of North Carolina Dry Eye Management Scale.

PURPOSE: To establish an initial estimation of the MCID of the University of North Carolina Dry Eye Management Scale (UNC DEMS) and assess its association with patient perceptions of symptom change. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (33.3% men, 67.7% women, mean age 60.5 yrs) with previous DEMS scores were recruited from a UNC ophthalmology clinic in spring 2014. We used anchor-based methods, categorizing important symptom change, to compare the change in the DEMS scores across visits to patient assessments of change; linear regression coefficients estimated the MCID. We correlated clinical assessments, patient perceptions, and DEMS scores. RESULTS: DEMS score changes correlated with global anchors [-0.4229 (P = 0.014)]. Unadjusted linear regression yielded a beta coefficient of -0.54 (confidence interval, -0.97 to -0.12, R = 0.18, P = 0.014), which estimated the DEMS MCID. Adjusting the regression model for days since the last visit and DEMS score improved the association (beta = -0.56; confidence interval, -0.99 to -0.13; R = 0.43; P = 0.013). Descriptive statistics produced an MCID of 1 point. Patients said that 2 points would represent a significant change. The DEMS modestly correlated with the Schirmer test (-0.4045, P = 0.0266), Oxford Grading Scheme (+0.3713, P = 0.0364), and tear breakup time (-0.3559, P = 0.0456). CONCLUSIONS: The UNC DEMS is a valid, responsive patient-reported outcome measure instrument, which is easy to use in the clinic and capable of showing an MCID of 1 point.

Survey of Emergency Department staff on disaster preparedness and training for Ebola virus disease.

INTRODUCTION: In the domestic response to the outbreak of Ebola virus disease from 2013 to 2015, many US hospitals developed and implemented specialized training programs to care for patients with Ebola. This research reports on the effects of targeted training on Emergency Department (ED) staff's Ebola-related perceptions and attitudes. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine members of the UNC Health Care System ED staff participated in a voluntary cross-sectional, anonymous Web survey administered using a one-time "post then pre" design. Participants responded to questions about risk, roles, willingness to provide care, preparedness, and the contributions of media, training, or time to opinion change using a Likert agree-disagree scale. The authors conducted t test comparisons of Likert responses to pretraining and post-training attitudes about Ebola preparedness. The authors conducted multinomial logistic regression analyses of index scores of change and positivity of responses, controlling for the effects of independent variables. RESULTS: ED staff's opinions supported training; 73 percent felt all workers should receive Ebola education, 60 percent agreed all hospitals should prepare for Ebola, 66 percent felt UNC was better prepared, and 66 percent felt it had done enough to be ready for an Ebola case. Most staff (79 percent) said they had gotten more training for Ebola than for other disease outbreaks; 58 percent had experienced prior epidemics. After training, workers' attitudes were more positive about Ebola preparation including perceived risk of transmission, readiness and ability to manage a patient case, understanding team roles, and trust in both personal protective equipment and the hospital system's preparations (13 measures, p < 0.0001 to p < 0.001). Overall, total opinion indices also changed significantly over the training period (Mean Difference [MD] = 17.45, SD = 9.89) and in the intended positive direction (MD = 15.80, SD = 0.91, p < 0.0001). Positive change and overall change from pre to post were significantly associated with more hours of training (p = 0.003). Despite different occupations, mean scores were similar. Staff rated training most important and media least important, as the sources of change in their attitudes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that diseasespecific training for novel pathogens such as Ebola may result in positive staff perceptions of self-efficacy and occupational efficacy to treat potentially infected patients in the ED setting. Training, in this case, outweighed media content in changing staff perceptions of Ebola management.

Development and validation of the Proxy-Reported Pulmonary Outcomes Scale for premature infants.

OBJECTIVE: Test the feasibility of using a bedside nurse-reported tool (Proxy-Reported Pulmonary Outcome Scale, PRPOS) for evaluating the severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) by assessing functional, disease-related measures. STUDY DESIGN: Bedside nurses tested the 26-item instrument by observing preterm infants (23-30 weeks at birth) at 36 to 37(4/7) weeks postmenstrual age before, during, and after a care time. We analyzed item reliability, validity, and model fit to determine the six items to include in the final measurement tool. RESULT: We completed assessments on 188 preterm infants. The frequency of an abnormal PRPOS item score increased with increasing National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD) BPD category. The six-candidate items produced an internally consistent scale. Addition of the NICHD BPD classification increased reliability moderately; addition of feeding items decreased reliability. The PRPOS score correlated with postmenstrual age at discharge. Infants discharged on oxygen or diuretics had higher median PRPOS scores than did infants who were not prescribed those therapies. CONCLUSION: The PRPOS is an internally consistent, proxy-reported measure of respiratory function in premature infants, based on observable, functional performance measures. Initial testing demonstrates known-groups validity and ongoing testing can assess predictive validity.

Training needs in operative obstetrics for maternal-fetal medicine fellows.

OBJECTIVE: To define residual operative obstetric training needs for first-year maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellows. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to all 100 first-year fellows. We used descriptive statistics to report frequency data for 13 procedures, and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for comfort in doing and teaching selected procedures. RESULTS: Response rate was 86% (n = 86). Fellows who completed residency in the Northeast/Midatlantic (n = 26) were less likely to report comfort doing or teaching low forceps deliveries (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05, 0.78; and 0.20, 95% CI 0.04, 0.85, respectively), while those completing fellowship in the West (n = 13), reported more comfort performing breech extraction of a second twin (OR 6.84, 95% CI 1.24, 51.50); fellows completing residency in the Southeast formed the referent group. Fellows reporting completion of the three selected procedures >5 times each during residency were significantly more likely to report comfort doing and teaching them as fellows. Type of residency program (community/academic) was not significantly associated with reported comfort. CONCLUSION: The wide range of operative obstetric experience fellows reported gaining in residency varies by region. Additional research is needed to understand competency and teaching ability for procedural skills, and many MFM fellows may need additional procedural experience.

The prevalence of clinical features associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia in a heterotaxy population: results of a web-based survey.

Primary ciliary dyskinesia and heterotaxy are rare but not mutually exclusive disorders, which result from cilia dysfunction. Heterotaxy occurs in at least 12.1% of primary ciliary dyskinesia patients, but the prevalence of primary ciliary dyskinesia within the heterotaxy population is unknown. We designed and distributed a web-based survey to members of an international heterotaxy organisation to determine the prevalence of respiratory features that are common in primary ciliary dyskinesia and that might suggest the possibility of primary ciliary dyskinesia. A total of 49 members (25%) responded, and 37% of the respondents have features suggesting the possibility of primary ciliary dyskinesia, defined as (1) the presence of at least two chronic respiratory symptoms, or (2) bronchiectasis or history of respiratory pathogens suggesting primary ciliary dyskinesia. Of the respondents, four completed comprehensive, in-person evaluations, with definitive primary ciliary dyskinesia confirmed in one individual, and probable primary ciliary dyskinesia identified in two others. The high prevalence of respiratory features compatible with primary ciliary dyskinesia in this heterotaxy population suggests that a subset of heterotaxy patients have dysfunction of respiratory, as well as embryonic nodal cilia. To better assess the possibility of primary ciliary dyskinesia, heterotaxy patients with chronic oto-sino-respiratory symptoms should be referred for a primary ciliary dyskinesia evaluation.

Instrument development of the UNC Dry Eye Management Scale.

PURPOSE: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular disease that can have adverse effects on quality of life. Our aim was to develop a single-item questionnaire that is reliable, patient-driven, and clinic friendly to assess DED symptoms and their effect on quality of life to help support the management of patients with DED. METHODS: An initial dry eye questionnaire was created and administered to 18 patients with DED followed by a 15-minute cognitive interviewing session. This questionnaire was then refined using feedback obtained from the cognitive interview and was termed the University of North Carolina Dry Eye Management Scale (UNC DEMS). Field testing was then performed on 66 patients (46 with DED and 20 without DED) to determine the validity and test-retest reliability of the UNC DEMS compared with the current gold standard, the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the UNC DEMS, OSDI, and other DED measures to assess criterion-related validity. Reliability coefficients were estimated for test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Comparing the UNC DEMS with the OSDI across all study participants, the correlation coefficient was 0.80 (P < 0.001). Comparing the UNC DEMS with the OSDI in the DED group, the correlation coefficient was 0.69 (P < 0.001). The test-retest reliability coefficient of the UNC DEMS was estimated to be 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: The UNC DEMS is a valid, reliable questionnaire that can be efficiently administered in a busy clinical practice and can be used to support the management of patients with DED.